Research ethics and infection control

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Keystone study of prevention of catheter-related infections in intensive care units raised important issues regarding infection control and research ethics. Infection control is an area common to public health and quality improvement. The performance of surveillance, the reporting of infection control data, and the response to complaints are all obligations raised by the international health regulations. The regulatory system around research ethics focuses on the individual subject in research and is not designed around areas such as infection control. Scientific methods are common to both infection control and research; both may result in "generalizable knowledge." Infection control physicians should work with their institutional review boards to try to streamline the process of ethics review. Regulatory change may be desirable to define and limit what infection control activities are construed as research. © 2009 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saginur, R. (2009, October 15). Research ethics and infection control. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/605666

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free