What Can Make Online Government Platforms Inclusive and Deliberative? A Reflection on Online Participatory Budgeting in Duinoord, The Hague

10Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

How can online government platforms meet principles of inclusivity and deliberation? We reflect on this question based on a recent case of online participatory budgeting in a neighborhood of The Hague, the Netherlands (Duinoord Begroot). In terms of inclusivity, our findings suggest that sending out personal invitations and setting few voting requirements can contribute to online voting rates. Furthermore, the use of few participation criteria in the initial stages of the process can enhance the diversity of gathered ideas. In terms of deliberation, we discuss how the structure of an online platform may ‘nudge’ citizens towards deliberation. The results indicate that while the platform generated an equal distribution of arguments in favor of and against proposals, it did not engage citizens en masse in online discussions. We suggest that building incentives and feedback loops into the platform could address this limitation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van der Does, R., & Bos, D. (2021). What Can Make Online Government Platforms Inclusive and Deliberative? A Reflection on Online Participatory Budgeting in Duinoord, The Hague. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 17(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.965

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free