Abstract
This brief provocation acknowledges the way the term “decolonization” has been used as a metaphor for diversification and has thus erased the anticolonial struggles of those Indigenous scholars and activists for whom diversity is not a stated end. Calling on the opposition between metaphor and metonymy in linguistic theory, I suggest that scholars of literary Romanticism-and by implication literary scholars in general-build our work not over but alongside decolonial movements and, in so doing, align our scholarship with demands for Indigenous sovereignty.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Chander, M. S. (2020). Romanticism and metonymic decolonization. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 33(1), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.3138/ECF.33.1.99
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.