Patient perception of pain versus observed pain behavior during a standardized electrodiagnostic test

6Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Clinicians often assume that observations of pain behavior are adequate for assessment of patient pain perception during procedures. This has not been tested during a standardized electrodiagnostic experience. Methods: During a prospective trial including extensive, standardized electrodiagnostic testing on persons with lumbar stenosis, vascular claudication, and asymptomatic volunteers, the subjects and an observer rated levels of pain. Results: In 60 subjects, observers significantly under-rated pain (Visual Analog Scale 3.17 ± 2.23 vs. 4.38 ± 2.01, t=-4.577, df=59, P<0.001). Perceived pain during testing related to bodily pain as measured by the visual analog, McGill, Pain Disability, and Quebec scales, but not age, duration of symptoms, Tampa kinesiphobia, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale, or SF-36 health quality of life. Conclusions: Persons with worse pain syndromes may perceive more pain during testing than others. Clinicians and researchers should understand that patients may have more pain than they recognize.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verson, J., Haig, A. J., Sandella, D., Yamakawa, K. S. J., London, Z., & Tomkins-Lane, C. (2015). Patient perception of pain versus observed pain behavior during a standardized electrodiagnostic test. Muscle and Nerve, 51(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24308

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free