Effectiveness of live poultry market interventions on human infection with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, China

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Various interventions for live poultry markets (LPMs) have emerged to control outbreaks of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in mainland China since March 2013. We assessed the effectiveness of various LPM interventions in reducing transmission of H7N9 virus across 5 annual waves during 2013–2018, especially in the final wave. With the exception of waves 1 and 4, various LPM interventions reduced daily incidence rates significantly across waves. Four LPM interventions led to a mean reduction of 34%–98% in the daily number of infections in wave 5. Of these, permanent closure provided the most effective reduction in human infection with H7N9 virus, followed by long-period, short-period, and recursive closures in wave 5. The effectiveness of various LPM interventions changed with the type of intervention across epidemics. Permanent LPM closure should be considered to maintain sufficient effectiveness of interventions and prevent the recurrence of H7N9 epidemics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, W., Artois, J., Wang, X., Kucharski, A. J., Pei, Y., Tong, X., … Yu, H. (2020). Effectiveness of live poultry market interventions on human infection with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, China. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26(5), 891–901. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2605.190390

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free