Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance and Immobilization Practice among Prehospital Emergency Medical Providers: A Statewide Survey

5Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives Pediatric cervical spine injuries are rare but potentially life threatening. Although published guidelines for assessment of such injuries exist, there is less uniformity in its implementation in out-of-hospital settings. Our purpose was to assess the knowledge and practice patterns for pediatric cervical spine immobilization among prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) providers in Arizona. Methods A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted (October-December 2018), using an electronic mailing list of certified EMS providers (ground and air) in Arizona. A 20-question structured web-based survey was developed and deployed. Results One hundred eight EMS stations were contacted with the survey. Sixty-eight providers responded; majority were emergency medical paramedics (73.1%). Most of the stations surveyed did not have a pediatric trauma center (66.2%). When treating children younger than 3 years, half of the respondents stated they did not know of a specific cervical spine clearance criterion; 59.3% felt that cervical spine immobilization was required "sometimes,"and 40.0% were unaware of the state's EMS pediatric cervical spine clearance algorithm; 93.9% of EMS providers felt that an age-based algorithm for cervical spine clearance in children would be useful. Conclusions In this statewide survey involving prehospital EMS providers, we found that pediatric cervical spine clearance and immobilization practices, even within a specific geographic location, remain inconsistent.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khetarpal, S., Smith, J., Weiss, B., Bhattarai, B., & Sinha, M. (2021). Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance and Immobilization Practice among Prehospital Emergency Medical Providers: A Statewide Survey. Pediatric Emergency Care, 37(8), E474–E478. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000002067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free