Abstract
Eligibility criteria were (1) having previously failed first-line nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens and (2) having achieved virologic suppression ≤6 months while receiving a protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen as second-line treatment. Eligible participants were randomized to receive either (1) ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) monotherapy (n = 29) or (2) LPV/r with optimized background regimens (OBRs; n = 31). Median duration of viral suppression before randomization was 45 months. At week 48, viral suppression during LPV/r monotherapy was 86.2% and did not differ from the suppression achieved with LPV/r with OBRs (87.1%, P = 1.000). However, persistent viremia during LPV/r monotherapy tended to be higher than during LPV/r with OBRs (10.3% versus 3.2%, P = .346). History of viral blip during virologic suppression with second-line PI-based regimen is a predictor of achieving viral suppression at all visits (adjusted relative risk 0.255 [95% confidence interval 0.080-0.821], P = .022). Use of LPV/r monotherapy as maintenance regimen in this study produced persistent viremia that tended to be higher than LPV/r monotherapy with OBRs. © The Author(s) 2014.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Siripassorn, K., Chottanapund, S., Prasithsirikul, W., & Manosuthi, W. (2014). Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir as maintenance monotherapy in HIV-infected patients who achieved viral suppression during a second-line protease inhibitor-based regimen: A pilot randomized trial (bidi-mono). Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care, 13(4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325957413511664
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.