Abstract
A survey conducted in five villages in a resource-poor farming community in Qwa-Qwa, using the rapid rural appraisal technique and a questionnaire survey, showed that a significant proportion of the farmers (84 %) use traditional or alternative methods to control ectoparasites, while 16 % use commercial acaricides (χ2 = 7.1; P ≤ 0.05). Alternative control methods included the use of used engine oil, household disinfectant and paraffin. Killing of ticks was the main reason for control (40 %), with disease control being second (20 %). Other reasons given for controlling ticks were to prevent damage to teats, to provide animals with a clean appearance and to protect hides. Some 40 % of farmers were aware of the effects of ticks on their animals. There is a need for farmer education that will provide information on integrated tick management and its advantages over absolute reliance on commercial acaricides.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hlatshwayo, M., & Mbati, P. A. (2005). A survey of tick control methods used by resource-poor farmers in the Qwa-Qwa area of the eastern Free State Province, South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 72(3), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v72i3.202
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.