The Nature of Deference and Demeanor

  • GOFFMAN E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
241Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper I want to explore some of the senses in which the person in our urban secular world is allotted a kind of sacredness that is displayed and confirmed by symbolic acts. An attempt will be made to build a conceptual scaffold by stretching and twisting some common anthropological terms. This will be used to support two concepts which I think are central to this area, deference and demeanor. Through these reformulations I will try to show that a version of Durkheim's social psychology can be effective in modern dress. Data for the paper are drawn chiefly from a brief observational study of Maryland mental patients in a modern research hospital.' I use these data on the assumption that a logical place to learn about personal proprieties is among persons who have been locked up for spectacularly failing to maintain them. Their infractions of propriety occur in the confines of a ward, but the rules broken are quite general ones, leading us outward from the ward to a general study of our Anglo-American society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

GOFFMAN, E. (1956). The Nature of Deference and Demeanor. American Anthropologist, 58(3), 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1956.58.3.02a00070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free