Intrarater reliability and interrater reliability in spinal motion assessments

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

[Purpose] The aim of the present study was to measure the interrater and intrarater reliabilities of spinal motions using a skin-surface device (SpinalMouse; Idiag, Voletswil, Switzerland). [Methods] Spinal motion was measured in upright standing, trunk flexion, and trunk extension in 38 healthy adults. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to examine between-day and interrater reliabilities for spinal motion. [Results] For intrarater reliability of Raters 1 and 2, Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.76-0.98, and ICC was 0.73-0.98, indicating high reliability in all cases except for extension of the sacral/hip. For interrater reliability on days 1 and 2, Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.75-0.97 and ICC was 0.77-0.97 for all cases except for extension of the sacral/hip. [Conclusion] The reliability of SpinalMouse was demonstrated to be fair or higher but the measurement for extension of the sacral/hip needs further investigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ko, T., Han, G., Cho, B., & Lee, K. (2010). Intrarater reliability and interrater reliability in spinal motion assessments. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 22(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.22.301

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free