Progression from metabolically benign to at-risk obesity in perimenopausal women: A longitudinal analysis of Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN)

20Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the natural history of progression from a metabolically benign overweight/obese (MBO) to at-risk overweight/obese (ARO) phenotype. Improved understanding would help clinicians focus on controlling risk factors that predispose an obese individual to progression. Methods: Using discrete-time proportional hazard modeling on data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), we examined the incident progression fromMBO(less than two metabolic syndrome abnormalities) to ARO (two or more metabolic syndrome abnormalities) and factors associated with progression over a 7-year period. Results: Of 866 MBO women at baseline, 43% progressed to the ARO phenotype. Compared with thosewhoremained MBO, thosewhoprogressed had higher baseline BMI and a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic abnormalities (elevated glucose, triglycerides, blood pressure and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). In multivariable analyses, an increase in body mass index was associated with a modest increase in the risk of progression. Although all cardiometabolic abnormalities were associated with an increased risk, the baseline impaired fasting glucose showed the strongest association with the risk of progression [hazard ratio 3.24; 95% confidence interval 2.10, 4.92; P < .001]. Physical activity played a protective role in decreasing the risk of progression [hazard ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.80, 0.92; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khan, U. I., Wang, D., Karvonen-Gutierrez, C. A., Khalil, N., Ylitalo, K. R., & Santoro, N. (2014). Progression from metabolically benign to at-risk obesity in perimenopausal women: A longitudinal analysis of Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN). Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 99(7), 2516–2525. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3259

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free