Acoustic telemetry versus monitored longline fishing for studying the vertical distribution of pelagic fish: Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in French Polynesia

39Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study compares detailed, nearly continuous, observations on bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus equipped with electronic tags, with discrete observations on a larger number of individuals from fishing experiments in order to validate the use of instrumented longlines to study the vertical distribution of fish. We show that the depth distributions obtained from the two different observation techniques regarding different environmental variables (temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), prey distribution) are similar. Bigeye tuna do not seem to be attracted by baits in the vertical dimension (no modification of their vertical distribution by the fishing gear), which allows the use of instrumented longlines to study the vertical behaviour of pelagic species. This technique, when used with appropriate deployment strategy, could therefore represent an alternative to electronic tags (acoustic or archival tags) when there is a need to determine the vertical distribution of fish species by size or sex, in different environments for the study of fishery interactions. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bach, P., Dagorn, L., Bertrand, A., Josse, E., & Misselis, C. (2003). Acoustic telemetry versus monitored longline fishing for studying the vertical distribution of pelagic fish: Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in French Polynesia. Fisheries Research, 60(2–3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(02)00180-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free