The Tension Between Militarisation and Democratisation in West Africa: A Comparative Analysis of Niger and Guinea

  • Matlosa K
  • Zounmenou D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While there has been some progress in West Africa towards shedding the dark history of militarism that spanned the 1960s-1980s and embracing democratisation, militarism still lingers, remaining a ghost that has haunted the democracy project that began in the region in the 1990s. Thus, West Africa has faced enormous challenges in its quest for democratisation. One of the biggest of these has been the militarisation of politics and of society at large. This problem persists even today, after encouraging progress towards democratisation in the past two decades. Two countries in the region that epitomise this recurring tension between militarisation and democratisation are undoubtedly Niger and Guinea. Both of them manifest the consequences of a governance deficit and the problems of democratic transition in which the military continues to play a dominant role. This chapter examines critically the tension between militarisation and democratisation in West Africa in general, with specific focus on Niger and Guinea. In an attempt to provide a comparative analysis of the two cases the chapter assesses progress made, highlights existing challenges and draws lessons that might be relevant for other African countries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matlosa, K., & Zounmenou, D. D. (2011). The Tension Between Militarisation and Democratisation in West Africa: A Comparative Analysis of Niger and Guinea. Journal of African Elections, 10(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.20940/jae/2011/v10i2a6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free