Impact of diabetes on cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis patients undergoing coronary revascularization

18Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Among hemodialysis (HD) patients, those who have diabetes have poorer cardiovascular outcomes than non-diabetic patients, but the impact of diabetes on cardiovascular outcomes has not been fully elucidated in HD patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Methods and Results: We identified 375 HD patients (203 diabetes, 172 non-diabetes) and 9,006 patients without HD (3,455 diabetes, 5,551 non-diabetes) in the database of the CREDO-Kyoto registry of patients undergoing their first coronary revascularization. In non-HD patients, significantly higher risks of death (10.8% vs. 7.7%, P<0.0001; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.29, P<0.0001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction and stroke (18.8% vs. 13.3%, P<0.0001; HR 1.36, P<0.0001) were seen in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients through 4-year follow-up. Analysis in HD patients showed that the duration of HD before first coronary revascularization was significantly shorter in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients (median interval: 858 vs. 2,216 days, P<0.0001). In contrast to the results in non-HD patients, the risks of death (41.9% vs. 39.1%, P=0.75; HR 0.98, P=0.93) and MACE (45.6% vs. 45.8%, P=0.83; HR 0.87, P=0.50) after first revascularization were comparable between diabetic and non-diabetic HD patients. There were significant interactions between HD and diabetes for death and for MACE. Conclusions: HD patients who require coronary revascularization have extremely poor outcomes irrespective of concomitant diabetes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Natsuaki, M., Furukawa, Y., Morimoto, T., Nakagawa, Y., Akao, M., Ono, K., … Kimura, T. (2011). Impact of diabetes on cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Circulation Journal, 75(7), 1616–1625. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-10-1235

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free