Increased sensitivity of Fancc-deficient hematopoietic cells to nitric oxide and evidence that this species mediates growth inhibition by cytokines

18Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fanconi anemia complementation group C (Fancc)-deficient murine bone marrow progenitors demonstrate increased sensitivity to growth inhibition by interferon γ (IFNγ), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), and macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP-1α). This property has been proposed as a possible pathogenic factor in the marrow failure seen in Fanconi anemia. Supporting our hypothesis that nitric oxide (NO) production might be a common effector In this sensitivity, we found that cytokine-mediated growth inhibition of Fancc-/- bone marrow cells was prevented by inhibiting NO synthase activity. Interestingly, Fancc-/- hematopoietic cells also exhibited increased growth inhibition on exposure to 2 distinct NO-generating agents, S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D, L-penicillamine (SNAP) and diethylenetriamine nitric oxide adduct (DETA/NO). In keeping with the sensitivity of Fancc-/- cells to IFNγ, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) levels and nitrite release were both increased following stimulation of Fancc-/- macrophages with this cytokine, either alone or in combination with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Suggesting a plausible mechanism for the increased expression of iNOS, IFNγ-stimulated Fancc-/- macrophages generated higher levels of phospho-Stat1, a positive regulator of inos (nos2) gene expression. These observations, while confined to C57BL/6 Fancc-/- hematopoietic cells, raise the possibility that nitric oxide has a role in the pathogenesis of Fanconi anemia. © 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hadjur, S., & Jirik, F. R. (2003). Increased sensitivity of Fancc-deficient hematopoietic cells to nitric oxide and evidence that this species mediates growth inhibition by cytokines. Blood, 101(10), 3877–3884. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-10-3147

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free