Designer buildings: Estimating the economic value of 'signature' architecture

59Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study investigates whether commercial offices designed by 'signature architects' in the United States achieve rental premiums compared with commercial offices designed by nonsignature architects. Focusing on buildings designed by winners of the Pritzker Prize and the Gold Medal awarded by the American Institute of Architects, we create a sample of commercial office buildings designed by signature architects, drawing on CoStar's comprehensive national database. We use a combination of hedonic regression model and a logit model to estimate the various price determinants. The results of the hedonic analysis suggest that, compared with buildings in the same submarket, office buildings designed by signature architects have rents that are 5%- 7% higher, and sell for prices 17% higher. The results from the second-stage logit estimation suggest a rental premium of approximately 5% for signature architects in large architectural practices, while the sales-price premium identified in the first stage hedonic regression was not confirmed. © 2011 Pion Ltd and its Licensors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fuerst, F., McAllister, P., & Murray, C. B. (2011). Designer buildings: Estimating the economic value of “signature” architecture. Environment and Planning A, 43(1), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free