Abstract
How do we treat those who make mistakes? And what does this have to do with architecture? The paper will investigate the role of architecture in the design of prisons in order to understand how we could develop a project for a jail that is a place for both punishment and rehabilitation. The effectiveness of a prison is not given only by the efficiency of the justice system in force, but also by the articulation of spaces and by the quality of the architecture. The contradiction of the prison is revealed by its need to respond to two opposing demands: punishment and reintegration. This paper investigates the possible design approaches aimed at designing a new jail typology, through an attempt to "break" the macro-themes that characterize the building of the prison and within these dichotomies work on the "boundary-line" between opposing realities: freedom―constriction; openness―closure; etc. If prison architecture were brought back into the debate regarding contemporary design culture, it could have a significant impact for society especially in terms of opportunities and cultural growth.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Vessella, L. (2017). Prison, architecture and social growth: Prison as an active component of the contemporary city. Plan Journal, 2(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.15274/tpj.2017.02.01.05
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.