Isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis in Birmingham, United Kingdom, 1999-2010

16Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There have been few studies on risk factors and treatment outcomes of isoniazid (H)-resistant tuberculosis (TB), and optimal treatment regimens are debated. Aim: To identify risk factors for H-resistant TB, describe treatment regimens and compare these to national guidelines and describe short-term outcomes of H-resistant TB in Birmingham, UK. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: Cases of H-resistant tuberculosis in Birmingham between January 1999 and December 2010 (n = 89) were compared with drug-susceptible cases (n = 2497). Treatment regimens and outcomes at 12 months from diagnosis were evaluated by case note review. Results: No independent predictors for H-resistant TB were found. For 76/89 (85%) patients with full treatment details available, median treatment duration was 11 months (interquartile range 9-12 months). Only 27/72 (38%) patients with H-monoresistance were treated in line with national guidelines. A further 14/72 (19%) were treated according to other recognized guidelines. Overall treatment success was 75/89 (84%). Treatment failure occurred in 6/89 (7%) patients, all developed multi-drug resistance. Poor adherence was documented in these patients and use of a non-standard regimen in one patient was not thought to have contributed to treatment failure. Conclusions: No discriminating risk factors for early detection of H-resistant TB were found. Treatment regimens in clinical practice were highly varied. H-resistance can drive MDR-TB when there is evidence or suspicion of poor adherence. A low threshold for enhanced case management with directly observed therapy is warranted in this group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Munang, M. L., Kariuki, M., & Dedicoat, M. (2015). Isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis in Birmingham, United Kingdom, 1999-2010. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine , 108(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcu139

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free