The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

89Citations
Citations of this article
479Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework supports students’ diversity principles in inclusive education settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of UDL principles in educational settings. The inclusion criteria of the systematic search include empirical peer-reviewed research (pre-and post-design) published between 2015 to 2021 in English and Arabic (N = 13). Findings of the systematic review revealed that the identified studies were conducted in six countries, either specific or generic domain-related; targeting K-12 or higher education levels, generally implemented all UDL principles, directed to teachers or students using professional development programmes or school interventions, and mainly used one group quantitative research design. The meta-analysis findings showed that the total effect sizes for the identified studies were 3.56; however, considerable heterogeneity was evident. The meta-analysis results specifically showed statistically significant effect sizes for one group studies, student participants, specific domain, and quantitative research design. Discussion and future directions are presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free