State of the Evidence for Facial Skin Cancer Reconstruction

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This review provides a comprehensive presentation of the evidence available in facial reconstruction post-Mohs micrographic surgery. Given the large diversity in post-Mohs reconstruction, there are limited guidelines in the management of defects. The aim of the present work is to provide a review of the best evidence as it pertains to several considerations in facial reconstruction. Data suggests that Mohs micrographic surgery and many reconstructive procedures can be performed as outpatient procedures under local anesthesia, with narcotic pain medication only given in certain patient populations following a minority of reconstructive procedures. Perioperative and topical antibiotics are generally not indicated. Aspirin and warfarin can generally be continued for most reconstructive procedures, but clopidogrel and novel anticoagulants may predispose to increased bleeding complications. Delayed reconstruction appears to be safe, although data are discordant on this topic. No specific wound closure technique or suture choice appears to be consistently superior. Given the lack of robust comparative studies, consistent methodology, and variable defect sizes/locations, no robust evidence-based guidelines can be generated for reconstruction techniques of facial subsites.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Desisto, N. G., Ortiz, A. S., Yang, S. F., Stephan, S. J., & Patel, P. N. (2023). State of the Evidence for Facial Skin Cancer Reconstruction. Facial Plastic Surgery, 39(3), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2008-2798

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free