Misspecification in mixed-model-based association analysis

4Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Additive genetic variance in natural populations is commonly estimated using mixed models, in which the covariance of the genetic effects is modeled by a genetic similarity matrix derived from a dense set of markers. An important but usually implicit assumption is that the presence of any nonadditive genetic effect increases only the residual variance and does not affect estimates of additive genetic variance. Here we show that this is true only for panels of unrelated individuals. In the case that there is genetic relatedness, the combination of population structure and epistatic interactions can lead to inflated estimates of additive genetic variance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kruijer, W. (2016). Misspecification in mixed-model-based association analysis. Genetics, 202(1), 363–366. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.177212

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free