Assessment of accuracy of the Vacu-med 17053 calibrator for ventilation, oxygen uptake (V̇ O2), and carbon dioxide production (V̇ CO2)

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few have examined the accuracy of mechanical calibrators used to calibrate metabolic monitors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Vacu-Med 17053 motorized syringe calibrator for accuracy against the accepted standard method: the Douglas bag. METHODS: We tested oxygen consumption (VO) values of 522-3,210 mL/min. We mixed room air and calibration gases in the pumping syringes of the Vacu-Med 17053 and evacuated those gases into a Douglas bag, measured the Douglas bag volumes and concentrations, and converted to pulmonary ventilation, V̇O, and carbon dioxide production (VCO2). RESULTS: The Vacu-Med 17053 calibrator overestimated VO2 by a mean 28.6 mL/min (1.3% error), underestimated VCO by 6.9 mL/min (-1.7% error), and underestimated pulmonary ventilation by 0.98 L/min (-1.4% error). The VO2 and VCO2 differences between the calibrator and the Douglas bag were larger at higher VO levels. CONCLUSIONS: The VO and VCO2 differences might be attributable to fluctuations of the calibrator settings. The Vacu-Med 17053 calibrator was accurate with the application of a mathematical correction. © 2011 Daedalus Enterprises.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bunn, J. A., Pittsley, J. L., Baker, S. V., & Yates, J. W. (2011). Assessment of accuracy of the Vacu-med 17053 calibrator for ventilation, oxygen uptake (V̇ O2), and carbon dioxide production (V̇ CO2). Respiratory Care, 56(4), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.00951

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free