The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled

1.6kCitations
Citations of this article
1.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, the author describes sweeping changes in the gender system and offers explanations for why change has been uneven. Because the devaluation of activities done by women has changed little, women have had strong incentive to enter male jobs, but men have had little incentive to take on female activities or jobs. The gender egalitarianism that gained traction was the notion that women should have access to upward mobility and to all areas of schooling and jobs. But persistent gender essentialism means that most people follow gender-typical paths except when upward mobility is impossible otherwise. Middle-class women entered managerial and professional jobs more than working-class women integrated blue-collar jobs because the latter were able to move up while choosing a "female" occupation; many mothers of middle-class women were already in the highest-status female occupations. The author also notes a number of gender-egalitarian trends that have stalled. © 2010 Sociologists for Women in Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender and Society, 24(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free