Evaluating the Use of Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modelling with Reflective Measurement in Organizational and Management Research: A Review and Recommendations for Best Practice

161Citations
Citations of this article
491Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Covariance-based structural equation modelling (CB-SEM) with reflective measurement has been a popular data analysis tool in organizational and management research. Extensive studies and guidelines have been published on what constitutes its best practice. What is much less known is the extent to which CB-SEM users in organizational and management research comprehend and adhere to the standards and principles behind this advanced analytical technique. In this study, we first devised an evaluation scheme to assess the quality of CB-SEM performed in a study, and then utilized this scheme to examine 144 CB-SEM studies published in 12 top organizational and management journals between 2011 and 2016. The evaluation of the published studies revealed a pressing need for more systematic and standardized approaches to planning, conducting and reporting CB-SEM studies. We discussed the implication of the findings for future work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, M. F., Dawson, J. F., & Kline, R. B. (2021). Evaluating the Use of Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modelling with Reflective Measurement in Organizational and Management Research: A Review and Recommendations for Best Practice. British Journal of Management, 32(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12415

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free