The impact of phlebotomy and hydroxyurea on survival and risk of thrombosis among older patients with polycythemia vera

28Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend therapeutic phlebotomy for all polycythemia vera (PV) patients and additional cytoreductive therapy (eg, hydroxyurea [HU]) for high-risk PV patients. Little is known about the impact of these therapies in the real-world setting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of older adults diagnosed with PV from 2007 to 2013 using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of phlebotomy and HU on overall survival (OS) and the occurrence of thrombotic events. Of 820 PV patients (median age=77 years), 16.3% received neither phlebotomy nor HU, 23.0% were managed with phlebotomy only, 19.6% with HU only, and 41.1% with both treatments. After a median follow-up of 2.83 years, 37.2% (n=305) of the patients died. Phlebotomy (yes/no; hazard ratio [HR]=0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.81; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Podoltsev, N. A., Zhu, M., Zeidan, A. M., Wang, R., Wang, X., Davidoff, A. J., … Ma, X. (2018). The impact of phlebotomy and hydroxyurea on survival and risk of thrombosis among older patients with polycythemia vera. Blood Advances, 2(20), 2681–2690. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2018021436

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free