Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes: a meta-analysis

71Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Residual leaks are not infrequent after left atrial appendage occlusion. However, there is still uncertainty regarding their Aims prognostic implications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of residual leaks after left atrial appendage occlusion. Methods A literature search was conducted until 19 February 2023. Residual leaks comprised peri-device leaks (PDLs) on transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or computed tomography (CT), as well as left atrial appendage patency on CT. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the clinical impact of residual leaks. Results Overall 48 eligible studies (44 non-randomized/observational and 4 randomized studies) including 61 666 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent left atrial appendage occlusion were analysed. Peri-device leak by TEE was present in 26.1% of patients. Computed tomography-based left atrial appendage patency and PDL were present in 54.9% and 57.3% of patients, respectively. Transoesophageal echocardiography-based PDL (i.e. any reported PDL regardless of its size) was significantly associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism [pooled odds ratio (pOR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52–2.74], all-cause mortality (pOR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.08–1.24), and major bleeding (pOR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03–1.22), compared with no reported PDL. A positive graded association between PDL size and risk of thromboembolism was noted across TEE cut-offs. For any PDL of >0, >1, >3, and >5 mm, the pORs for thromboembolism were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.35–2.47), 2.13 (95% CI: 1.04–4.35), 4.14 (95% CI: 2.07–8.27), and 4.44 (95% CI: 2.09–9.43), respectively, compared with either no PDL or PDL smaller than each cut-off. Neither left atrial appendage patency, nor PDL by CT was associated with thromboembolism (pOR 1.45 and 1.04, 95% CI: 0.84–2.50 and 0.52–2.07, respectively). Conclusions Peri-device leak detected by TEE was associated with adverse events, primarily thromboembolism. Residual leaks detected by CT were more frequent but lacked prognostic significance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Samaras, A., Papazoglou, A. S., Balomenakis, C., Bekiaridou, A., Moysidis, D. V., Patsiou, V., … Tzikas, A. (2024, January 14). Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad828

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free