A retrospective analysis of case-load and supervision from a large anaesthetic logbook database

12Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The recent development of electronic logbooks with secure off-device data storage provides a rich resource for research. We present the largest analysis of anaesthetic logbooks to date, with data from 494,235 cases logged by 964 anaesthetists over a 4-year period. Our analysis describes and compares the annual case-load and supervision levels of different grades of anaesthetists across the UK and Republic of Ireland. We calculated the number of cases undertaken per year by grade (median (IQR [range]) core trainees = 388 (252–512 [52–1204]); specialist trainees = 344 (228–480 [52–1144]); and consultants = 328 (204–500 [52–1316]). Overall, the proportion of cases undertaken with direct consultant supervision was 56.7% and 41.6% for core trainees and specialist trainees, respectively. The proportion of supervised cases reduced out-of-hours, for both core trainees (day 93.5%, evening 86.3%, night 78.6%) and specialist trainees (day 81.0%, evening 67.7%, night 56.4%).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perella, P., Palmer, E., Conway, R., & Wong, D. J. N. (2019). A retrospective analysis of case-load and supervision from a large anaesthetic logbook database. Anaesthesia, 74(12), 1524–1533. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14843

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free