Treatment of Facial Dog Bite Injuries in the Emergency Department Compared to the Operating Room

9Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To assess factors associated with repair of facial dog bites in the emergency department (ED) versus the operating room (OR) and to compare rates of surgical site infection and reoperation for each venue. Study Design: Case series with chart review. Setting: Single institution. Subjects and Methods: All patients younger than 18 years of age who underwent surgical repair by a consulting surgical service within 24 hours of presentation for facial dog bites between 2010 and 2013 were included. Demographics, site of injury, associated evidence of complex injury, surgical site infections within 30 days, and reoperation within 2 years were compared between patients undergoing surgical repair in the ED versus the OR. Results: One hundred sixty-five patients were evaluated; 75 patients underwent repair in the ED, and 90 patients were treated in the OR. Patients treated in the ED underwent surgery more promptly than patients treated in the OR (median time from arrival to procedure start 3.3 vs 6.8 hours, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Essig, G. F., Sheehan, C. C., Niermeyer, W. L., Lopez, J. J., & Elmaraghy, C. A. (2019). Treatment of Facial Dog Bite Injuries in the Emergency Department Compared to the Operating Room. OTO Open, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X19858328

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free