Optimal Bounds for Approximate Counting

10Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Storing a counter incremented N times would naively consume O(log N) bits of memory. In 1978 Morris described the very first streaming algorithm: The "Morris Counter"[15]. His algorithm's space bound is a random variable, and it has been shown to be O(log log N + log(1/?) + log(1/)) bits in expectation to provide a (1+?)-Approximation with probability $1-dto the counter's value. We provide a new simple algorithm with a simple analysis showing that randomized space O(log log N + log(1/?) + log log(1/)) bits suffice for the same task, i.e. an exponentially improved dependence on the inverse failure probability. We then provide a new analysis showing that the original Morris Counter itself, after a minor but necessary tweak, actually also enjoys this same improved upper bound. Lastly, we prove a new lower bound for this task showing optimality of our upper bound. We thus completely resolve the asymptotic space complexity of approximate counting. Furthermore all our constants are explicit, and our lower bound and tightest upper bound differ by a multiplicative factor of at most 3+o(1).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nelson, J., & Yu, H. (2022). Optimal Bounds for Approximate Counting. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (pp. 119–127). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517804.3526225

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free