Reading Text While Driving

  • Liang Y
  • Horrey W
  • Hoffman J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

ObjectiveIn this study, we investigated how drivers adapt secondary-task initiation and time-sharing behavior when faced with fluctuating driving demands. BackgroundReading text while driving is particularly detrimental; however, in real-world driving, drivers actively decide when to perform the task. MethodIn a test track experiment, participants were free to decide when to read messages while driving along a straight road consisting of an area with increased driving demands (demand zone) followed by an area with low demands. A message was made available shortly before the vehicle entered the demand zone. We manipulated the type of driving demands (baseline, narrow lane, pace clock, combined), message format (no message, paragraph, parsed), and the distance from the demand zone when the message was available (near, far). ResultsIn all conditions, drivers started reading messages (drivers' first glance to the display) before entering or before leaving the demand zone but tended to wait longer when faced with increased driving demands. While reading messages, drivers looked more or less off road, depending on types of driving demands. ConclusionsFor task initiation, drivers avoid transitions from low to high demands; however, they are not discouraged when driving demands are already elevated. Drivers adjust time-sharing behavior according to driving demands while performing secondary tasks. Nonetheless, such adjustment may be less effective when total demands are high. ApplicationThis study helps us to understand a driver's role as an active controller in the context of distracted driving and provides insights for developing distraction interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liang, Y., Horrey, W. J., & Hoffman, J. D. (2015). Reading Text While Driving. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814542974

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free