Examining diet quality and body mass index in rural areas using a quantile regression framework

11Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Under- and overeating (based on calories) are different problems than being under- and overweight (based on BMI); they thus require different economic prescriptions. To study these differences, I use a quantile regression method that allows an examination of covariate effects at different points in the distribution. The examination focuses on differences in rural and urban areas, and also in characteristics such as education, age, and other economic, demographic and behavior variables. Results suggest that policy in rural areas and the South must emphasize recommendations based on dietary guidelines. I also find that the characteristics typical of rural areas have a large effect regardless of the region. © Southern Regional Science Association 2010.

References Powered by Scopus

Quantile regression

3710Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A low-carbohydrate as compared with a low-fat diet in severe obesity

1115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recent advances in quantile regression models: A practical guideline for empirical research

883Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Adherence to the Australian dietary guidelines during pregnancy: Evidence from a national study

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bayesian tobit quantile regression with L<inf>1/2</inf> penalty

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A simulation study of the potential effects of healthy food and beverage substitutions on diet quality and total energy intake in lower Mississippi delta adults

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asirvatham, J. (2009). Examining diet quality and body mass index in rural areas using a quantile regression framework. Review of Regional Studies, 39(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.8210

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘20‘22‘23‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

80%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

50%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

17%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Psychology 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0