Nitrogen concentration in mountain pine beetle larvae reflects nitrogen status of the tree host and two fungal associates

27Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Individual lodgepole pines (Pinus contorta) were fertilized with urea at nitrogen (N) inputs equivalent to 0, 315, or 630 kg/ha. Four months after application of the fertilizer, inner bark tissue N concentrations were significantly higher in the trees that had received the low dose (315 kg/ha) fertilization treatment than in the control trees; trees that had received the high-dose treatment (630 kg/ha) were intermediate and not significantly different from either of the other treatments. There was a significant positive correlation between N concentration in inner bark tissue and larval mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae). In vitro studies on synthetic growth media examined effects of temperature and N concentration on N concentration of two common fungal associates of the mountain pine beetle (Ophiostoma clavigerum and Ophiostoma montium). Increasing N concentration in growth media significantly increased fungal N concentrations in both O. clavigerum and O. montium. Furthermore, N concentration was consistently higher in O. clavigerum than in O. montiun. Neither species had sufficient growth at 30°C, nor did O. clavigerum at 15°C, to test N concentration. However, for O. montium, increasing temperatures decreased fungal N concentrations. There was no correlation between N concentration of O. clavigerum and growth temperature. Potential impacts of ingestion of the fungal species by developing mountain pine beetle larvae-infesting trees under various environmental conditions such as increasing temperatures are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cook, S. P., Shirley, B. M., & Zambino, P. J. (2010). Nitrogen concentration in mountain pine beetle larvae reflects nitrogen status of the tree host and two fungal associates. Environmental Entomology, 39(3), 821–826. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN09305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free