Enacting memories through and with things: Remembering as material engagement

25Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For mainstream theories, memory is a skull-bound activity consisting of encoding, storing and retrieving representations. Conversely, unorthodox perspectives proposed that memory is an extended process that includes material resources. This article explains why neither representationalist nor classical extended stances do justice to the active and constitutive role of material culture for cognition. From Material Engagement Theory, we propose an alternative enactive, ecological, extended and semiotic viewpoint for which remembering is a way of materially engaging with and through things. Specifically, we suggest that one remembers when one updates their interactions with the world, a form of engagement previously acquired through sociomaterial practices. Moreover, we argue that things are full-fledged memories, since they accumulate and bring forth how we have materially engaged with them over different timescales. Last, we highlight the need for studies considering the cognitive ecologies where remembering takes place in its full complexity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prezioso, E., & Alessandroni, N. (2023). Enacting memories through and with things: Remembering as material engagement. Memory Studies, 16(4), 962–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221108475

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free