On Political and Psychological Essentialisms

  • Stoler A
36Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A comment on Larry Hirschfeld's "The Conceptual Politics of Race: Lessons from Our Children" (1997 [see abstract 9803531]) seeks to find common ground with his conception of race as a matter preeminently of mind & secondarily of power. Though he will be misread, Hirschfeld is not proposing that racial categories of power are determined by categories of mind, but that humans have a propensity to classify human kinds in essentialist ways that support racial thinking. Given this intention, agreement is registered with Hirschfeld's proposal that racial thinking builds on a common set of principles about the relationship between the appearance & inner essence of race. But disagreement is registered over whether those principles are intrinsic to the way the human mind is mapped or whether they gain significance within a particular social system. Research on colonial social policy contradicts Hirschfeld's assertion that racial thinking comes naturally. 6 References. D. M. Smith

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stoler, A. L. (1997). On Political and Psychological Essentialisms. Ethos, 25(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1997.25.1.101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free