Artificial Skin and Biopolitical Masks, or How to Deal with Face-Habits

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Building on the case study of the performative practice of voguing within ballroom culture among LGBTQIA+ communities, the aim of this article is to recognize a facial agency capable of putting into tension three thresholds of meaning: visibility and invisibility; identity and otherness; nature and artifice. On the basis of these tensions, interpretive habits concerning identity are incorporated into the face as a semiotic dispositif that negotiate sociocultural expectations and limitations. These habits, when agentively performed through the face, give shape to a communicative project that manipulates platforms of identity into biopolitical masks. The analysis will also give an account of how “worn” biopolitical masks reproduce and perform a facial monstrum, or warning, and how this specification warns others of the normativity of aesthetic and biopolitical appearance while activating an intentional transformation of identity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Voto, C. (2022). Artificial Skin and Biopolitical Masks, or How to Deal with Face-Habits. Signs and Society, 10(1), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1086/717563

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free