Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements

151Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Method comparison studies are usually analyzed by computing limits of agreement. It is recommended that replicate measurements be taken by each method, but the resulting data are more cumbersome to analyze. We discuss the statistical model underlying the classical limits of agreement and extend it to the case with replicate measurements. As the required code to fit the models is non-trivial, we provide example computer code to fit the models, and show how to use the output to derive measures of repeatability and limits of agreement. Copyright ©2008 The Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carstensen, B., Simpson, J., & Gurrin, L. C. (2008). Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements. International Journal of Biostatistics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free