Reassessing single-stent techniques for isolated left anterior descending ostial disease: a two-year intravascular ultrasound-guided retrospective comparison of precise ostial, floating, and crossover stenting strategies

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for isolated left anterior descending (LAD) ostial lesions remains challenging, with limited comparative data on stenting strategies. We aimed to evaluate the procedural and long-term outcomes of three single-stent techniques: precise ostial stenting (POS), floating stenting (FS), and crossover stenting (CS). Methods: In this retrospective study, 116 patients with isolated LAD ostial disease underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI using one of the three strategies. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, IVUS findings, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) over two years were compared. Results: Compared to POS and FS, CS resulted in larger minimal stent area at the ostium, and a higher rate of complete stent coverage (100% vs. 39.5% and 23.1%, p < 0.001). At 2-year follow-up, MACCE rates were significantly lower in the CS group (2.6%) compared to FS (13.5%) and POS (15.8%, p = 0.039), mainly due to reduced target lesion revascularization. FS showed improved coverage compared to POS, but inferior angiographic outcomes and higher event rates than CS. Conclusions: In IVUS-guided PCI for isolated LAD ostial lesions, CS offers superior ostial coverage and clinical outcomes. FS may serve as a compromise when anatomical constraints limit crossover. These findings support a tailored strategy based on lesion characteristics and IVUS assessment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, X., Wu, M., Huang, H., Liu, Z., Huang, H., & Wang, L. (2025). Reassessing single-stent techniques for isolated left anterior descending ostial disease: a two-year intravascular ultrasound-guided retrospective comparison of precise ostial, floating, and crossover stenting strategies. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04894-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free