Foxes, hounds, and horses: Who or which?

21Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Writers of English can choose whether to mark a high level of sentience in a nonhuman animal by selecting the word who rather than which. An examination of texts relating to foxhunting on the world wide web showed that, in reference to the nonhuman animals involved in foxhunting, writers were most likely to use who in reference to foxes, and least likely to use it in reference to horses. Those who support foxhunting are more likely to recognize the sentience of the fox than those who oppose foxhunting. This may be because those who enjoy foxhunting present the fox as an active creator of the hunt, and as a worthy opponent. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gupta, A. F. (2006). Foxes, hounds, and horses: Who or which? Society and Animals, 14(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006776137113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free