Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced breast MRI versus X-ray mammography in women with different degrees of breast density

10Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Detection of breast cancer in women with high breast densities is a clinical challenge. Purpose: To study the influence of different degrees of breast density on the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (CE-BMRI) versus X-ray mammography (XRM). Material and Methods: We performed an additional analysis of two large Phase III clinical trials (G1; G2) which included women with histologically proven breast cancers, called “index cancers.” Additional cancers were detected during image reading. We compared the sensitivity of CE-BMRI and XRM in women with different breast densities (ACR A→D; Version 5). For each study, six blinded readers evaluated the images. Results are given as the “Median Reader.” Results: A total of 774 patients were included, 169 had additional cancers. While sensitivity of CE-BMRI for detecting all index cancers was independent of breast density (ACR A→D) (G1: 83%→83%; G2: 91%→91%) the sensitivity of XRM declined (ACR A→D) (G1: 79%→62%; G2: 82%→64%). Thus, the sensitivity difference between both imaging modalities in ACR A breasts of 3% (G1) and 9% (G2) increased to 21% (G1) and 26% (G2) in ACR D breasts. Sensitivity of CE-BMRI for detecting at least one additional cancer increased with increasing breast density (ACR A→D) (G1: 50%→73%, G2: 57%→81%). XRM’s sensitivity decreased (G1: 34%→20%) or remained stable (G2: 24%→25%). Conclusion: CE-BMRI showed significantly higher sensitivity compared to XRM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barkhausen, J., Bischof, A., Haverstock, D., Klemens, M., Brueggenwerth, G., Weber, O., & Endrikat, J. (2021). Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced breast MRI versus X-ray mammography in women with different degrees of breast density. Acta Radiologica, 62(5), 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120936271

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free