A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic™ laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal™ laryngeal mask airway

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We tested the oropharyngeal leak pressure with the reusable laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal™ laryngeal mask airway. These two types of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) have a similar design but the reusable LMA cuff is made from silicone whereas the Soft Seal LMA cuff is polyvinylchloride. Thirty-five healthy subjects were anaesthetized and paralyzed and the two types of Soft Seal LMA were compared in a blinded randomized cross-over trial. The oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher with the Soft Seal than the reuable (21 ± 7.6 and 16 ± 6.7 cm H2O respectively, P=0.002). However, in four subjects the oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher with the reusable by >4 cm H2O. We concluded that the reusable LMA may provide a better seal in some individuals but that, on average, the Soft Seal provides a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than the reusable LMA.

References Powered by Scopus

Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway

1610Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The LMA 'ProSeal' - A laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent

400Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: Safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage

362Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Non–Laryngeal Mask Airway Supraglottic Airway Devices

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A randomised crossover trial comparing a single-use polyvinyl chloride laryngeal mask airway with a single-use silicone laryngeal mask airway

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hanning, S. J., McCulloch, T. J., Orr, B., & Anderson, S. P. (2006). A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable ClassicTM laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft SealTM laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 34(2), 237–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0603400210

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

90%

Immunology and Microbiology 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free