Theory-driven process evaluation of the SHINE trial using a program impact pathway approach

34Citations
Citations of this article
144Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two reasons for the lack of success of programs or interventions are poor alignment of interventions with the causes of the problem targeted by the intervention, leading to poor efficacy (theory failure), and failure to implement interventions as designed (program failure). These failures are important for both public health programs and randomized trials. In the Sanitation Hygiene and Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) Trial, we utilize the program impact pathway (PIP) approach to track intervention implementation and behavior uptake. In this article, we present the SHINE PIP including definitions and measurements of key mediating domains, and discuss the implications of this approach for randomized trials. Operationally, the PIP can be used for monitoring and strengthening intervention delivery, facilitating course-correction at various stages of implementation. Analytically, the PIP can facilitate a richer understanding of the mediating and modifying determinants of intervention impact than would be possible from an intention-to-treat analysis alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mbuya, M. N. N., Jones, A. D., Ntozini, R., Humphrey, J. H., Moulton, L. H., Stoltzfus, R. J., & Maluccio, J. A. (2015). Theory-driven process evaluation of the SHINE trial using a program impact pathway approach. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 61, S752–S758. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ716

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free