A comparison of logging planning, felling, and skyline yarding costs between clearcutting and five group-selection harvesting methods

29Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Logging planning, felling, and cable yarding costs were determined for five group-selection treatments and a clearcut in a 90 yr old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stand in western Oregon. The harvesting system included manual felling and a yarder rigged in a standing skyline configuration with a mechanical slackpulling carriage. The clearcut treatment had the lowest total harvest cost; costs of the group-selection treatments were 7.3 to 31.5% higher than the clearcut. Yarding cost associated with road and landing changes, plus the cost of equipment moving, set up, and tear down allocated over different treatment volumes removed had the biggest influence on total cost for each silvicultural treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kellogg, L. D., Bettinger, P., & Edwards, R. M. (1996). A comparison of logging planning, felling, and skyline yarding costs between clearcutting and five group-selection harvesting methods. Western Journal of Applied Forestry. Society of American Foresters. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/11.3.90

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free