Effects of grass species on ruminal degradability of silages and prediction of dry matter effective degradability

17Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Forty samples of grass silages, made from the five most widely used grass species in ruminant nutrition {Dactylis glomerata L., Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L., Festuca arundinacea L. and hybrid Felina) were tested in the present study. These grass species conserved by an ensiling process were compared among each other according to dry matter (DM) rumen degradability parameters (a=portion of DM solubilized at initiation of incubation, b=fraction of DM potentially degradable in the rumen, c=rate constant of disappearance of fraction b and EDDM=effective degradability of DM, estimated for each ingredient assuming the rumen solid outflow rates of 0.02 (EDDM2), 0.05 (EDDM5) and 0.08 (EDDM8) h-1). Based on the chemical composition of grass silages the regression equations for prediction of EDDM were evaluated. The influence of the ensiling process on dry matter degradability parameters was also assessed. The best values of EDDM were determined for Lolium perenne (ED DM2=753.2, EDDM5=631.1 and EDDM8=567.7 g/kg DM). The best predictor was NDF (R2-values of 0.757 (ED DM2), 0.863 (EDDM5) and 0.906 (EDDM8)). Using two predictors the accuracy level increased. The combination of CF and NDF gave R2-values 0.892, 0.920 and 0.929 for EDDM2, ED DM5 and EDDM8, respectively. The regression equations based on the most important grass species harvested in different vegetation periods seem to be a useful tool for practical use. No significant (P < 0.05) effect of the ensiling process in relation to dry matter rumen degradability parameters was proved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jančík, F., Koukolová, V., Kubelková, P., & Čermák, B. (2009). Effects of grass species on ruminal degradability of silages and prediction of dry matter effective degradability. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54(7), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.17221/1725-cjas

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free