Single mandibular implant study – chewing efficiency – 5-year results from a randomized clinical trial using two different implant loading protocols

7Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the chewing efficiency of edentulous patients wearing complete dentures, treated with a single implant in the mandible, placed underneath the existing mandibular dentures, using two different loading protocols (immediate loading or conventional loading), over an observation period of 5 years. Methods: One-hundred and fifty-eight (158) edentulous seniors aged 60-89 years received an implant in the midline of the lower jaw and were randomized either to the immediate loaded group A (n=81) or the conventional loaded group B (n=77). Chewing efficiency was obtained before treatment, one month after implant placement during the submerged healing phase (only group B) and 1, 4, 12, 24 and 60 months after implant loading. Results: After 5 years, chewing tests from 89 patients (45 in the immediate loading group and 44 in the conventional loading group) were available for every recall visit and thus statistically analyzed. The chewing efficiency increased over time in both groups. A significant increase was observed up to 4 months after loading (p≤0.05). Later, chewing efficiency further increased, but not significantly. Between the two loading protocols, chewing efficiency did not differ significantly (p>0.05) at any follow-up investigation. Conclusion: A single mandibular implant placed underneath existing mandibular dentures improves chewing efficiency of edentulous patients significantly over an observation period of 5 years, irrespective of the loading protocol.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Passia, N., Ali, S., Behrendt, C., Fritzer, E., Kohal, R. J., Luthardt, R. G., … Kern, M. (2022). Single mandibular implant study – chewing efficiency – 5-year results from a randomized clinical trial using two different implant loading protocols. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 66(4), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free