Seasonal changes in microbial community structure in freshwater stream sediment in a North Carolina river basin

33Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examined seasonal differences in microbial community structure in the sediment of three streams in North Carolina's Neuse River Basin. Microbes that reside in sediment are at the base of the food chain and have a profound influence on the health of freshwater stream environments. Terminal-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP), molecular fingerprint analysis of 16S rRNA genes was used to examine the diversity of bacterial species in stream sediment. Sediment was sampled in both wet and dry seasons from an agricultural (Bear), mixed urban (Crabtree) and forested (Marks) Creek, and the microbiota examined. Gamma, Alpha and Beta proteobacteria were prevalent species of microbial taxa represented among all sites. Actinobacteria was the next most prevalent species observed, with greater occurrence in dry compared to the wet season. Discernable clustering was observed of Marks and Bear Creek samples collected during the wetter period (September-April), which corresponded with a period of higher precipitation and cooler surface water temperatures. Although not statistically significant, microbial community structure appeared different between season (ANOSIM, R = 0.60; p < 0.10). Principal components analysis confirmed this pattern and showed that the bacterial groups were separated by wet and dry seasonal periods. These results suggest seasonal differences among the microbial community structure in sediment of freshwater streams and that these communities may respond to changes in precipitation during wetter periods. © 2014 by the authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bucci, J. P., Szempruch, A. J., Caldwell, J. M., Ellis, J. C., & Levine, J. F. (2014). Seasonal changes in microbial community structure in freshwater stream sediment in a North Carolina river basin. Diversity, 6(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/d6010018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free