Analysis of Backbone UIN Sunan Kalijaga Network Development in Yogyakarta Using Comparison of Static Routing Protocol and OSPF Dynamic Routing

Abstract

The development of information technology, especially computer networks, both in terms of Local Area Network (LAN) and the Internet network within the Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University, Yogyakarta is needed to support the exchange of data or information between units, faculties, and universities. To support network development is needed a network design topology that will connect between buildings at UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, which uses static routing as the everapplied routing and OSPF dynamic routing as a routing protocol in the comparison of current network development. Network development is carried out in the form of modeling (simulation) using EVE-NG (Emulated Virtual Environment Next Generation). In developing the application of OSPF static and dynamic routing protocols an analysis is performed to determine the performance produced by the two routing protocols, and testing is done by using QoS parameters such as Throughput, Packet Loss, Delay, and Jitter. The test results show the value obtained between static and dynamic OSPF routing protocols with normal and busy testing scenarios include normal static protocol routing throughput of 596.82 Bps and OSPF of 598.39 Bps, while for busy scenarios using static routing protocols are 595.50 Bps and OSPF dynamic routing is 597.57 Bps. The average value for Packet loss for both routing protocols is 0%. The average value of normal scenario delay protocol static routing is 59.52 Bps and dynamic routing OSPF is 59.36 Bps, while for busy scenarios using static routing protocol is 59.65 Bps and OSPF dynamic routing is 59.44 Bps. The value of Jitter generated from both routing is still in the range between numbers 0-75 ms. Even though the value of the comparison of the results of the tests carried out does not show a significant value, but shows that the network that implements static routing has better performance than the network that applies OSPF dynamic routing.