Tailored radiation dose according to margin width for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A 2 mm resection margin is considered adequate for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We assessed the effectiveness of a tailored radiation dose for margins < 2 mm and the appropriate margin width for high-risk DCIS. We retrospectively evaluated 137 patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS between 2013 and 2019. The patients were divided into three– positive, close (< 2 mm), and negative (≥ 2 mm) margin groups. Radiation dose to the tumor bed in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions were a median of 66.25 Gy, 61.81 Gy, and 59.75 Gy for positive, close, and negative margin groups, respectively. During a median follow-up of 58 months, the crude rates of local recurrence were 15.0%, 6.7%, and 4.6% in the positive, close, and negative margin groups, respectively. The positive margin group had a significantly lower 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate compared to the close and negative margin groups in propensity-weighted log-rank analysis (84.82%, 93.27%, and 93.20%, respectively; p = 0.008). The difference in 5-year LRFS between patients with the high- and non-high-grade tumors decreased as the margin width increased (80.4% vs. 100.0% for margin ≥ 2 mm, p < 0.001; 92.3% vs. 100.0% for margin ≥ 6 mm, p = 0.123). With the radiation dose tailored for margin widths, positive margins were associated with poorer local control than negative margins, whereas close margins were not. Widely clear margins (≥ 2 mm) were related to favorable local control for high-grade DCIS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H., Kim, T. G., Park, B., Kim, J., Jun, S. Y., Lee, J. H., … Kim, H. (2024). Tailored radiation dose according to margin width for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50840-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free