Penalized for Personality: A Case Study of Asian-Origin Disadvantage at the Point of Hire

26Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Do employers penalize Asian-origin workers for personality-related reasons during real hiring decisions? Current theoretical approaches—the Model Minority Myth perspective and the Heterogeneity approach—provide conflicting predictions as to the nature of an Asian-origin personality penalty, if one exists. Furthermore, evidence of an Asian-origin personality penalty is typically derived from laboratory experiments based on evaluation of fictitious material rather than from real hiring decisions based on face-to-face interviews and hiring deliberations. To fill the empirical gap and resolve theoretical tension, I provide evidence of an Asian-origin personality penalty from a case study of hiring at a Silicon Valley high-technology firm. Drawing from quantitative and qualitative data, I demonstrate how the firm’s decision makers penalize Asian-origin job candidates during hiring decisions for their judged personality traits in a way that does not fully coincide with either theoretical approach, and I propose a theoretical model to describe the personality “content” of the Asian-origin personality penalty as it occurs in real hiring decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chavez, K. (2021). Penalized for Personality: A Case Study of Asian-Origin Disadvantage at the Point of Hire. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 7(2), 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220922270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free