Ambulatory 4-day continuous-infusion schedule of high-dose ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in advanced solid tumours: A phase I study

20Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is evidence that continuous infusion allows the delivery of higher doses of a drug while reducing the incidence of neurologic and renal toxicity. To verify prior to phase II testing the feasibility of ambulatory treatment with high-dose ifosfamide/mesna by continuous infusion in adult solid tumours, the maximum tolerated dose (MTU) and the non-haematological dose-limiting toxicities for the achievement of 2 courses of therapy were determined. Patients and methods: Thirty-two patients with advanced solid tumours were given continuous-infusion ifosfamide, from 9 to 16 g/m2, over 4 consecutive days, with equidose mesna uroprotection and granulocyte colony-stimulating-factor support; courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Total dose/course was escalated by 1 g/m2, in cohorts of 3 to 5 patients until the MTD was determined. Results: At 16 g/m2, the dose-limiting toxicity was renal, with 2 of the 5 patients treated developing renal failure. Haematological toxicity was dose-related and significant at higher dosages, but generally surmountable. Ifosfamide at 15 g/m2/course with mesna uroprotection was identified as the MTD. Conclusions: The present study shows that high-dose continuous-infusion ifosfamide, administered by portable infusion pumps, is feasible in an ambulatory regimen, with acceptable non-haematological toxicity and good patient compliance. © 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toma, S., Palumbo, R., Comandone, A., Oliva, C., Vincenti, M., Bumma, C., & Rosso, R. (1995). Ambulatory 4-day continuous-infusion schedule of high-dose ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in advanced solid tumours: A phase I study. Annals of Oncology, 6(2), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059118

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free