Computer science and parsimony: A reappraisal, with discussion of methods for poorly structured datasets

10Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In recent years, several publications in computer science journals have proposed new heuristic methods for parsimony analysis. This contribution discusses those papers, including methods highly praised by their authors, such as Hydra, Sampars and GA + PR + LS. Trees of comparable or better scores can be obtained using the program TNT, but from one to three orders of magnitude faster. In some cases, the search methods are very similar to others long in use in phylogenetics, but the enormous speed differences seem to correspond more to poor implementations than to actual differences in the methods themselves.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goloboff, P. A. (2015). Computer science and parsimony: A reappraisal, with discussion of methods for poorly structured datasets. Cladistics, 31(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12082

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free